Head to head
Kingbull Rover 2.0 vs Haoqi Cheetah 2.0
We earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Affiliate disclosure.
Two mountain frames from Kingbull and Haoqi at $1,299 and $1,599. The Kingbull Rover 2.0 offers a lower price. The Haoqi Cheetah 2.0 offers a bigger battery, a longer claimed range, a lighter frame.
The tradeoff: neither bike wins everywhere, so the better one depends on whether you value a lower price or a bigger battery. Specs are taken from each brand's own product listing. We do not claim hands-on testing. Last checked 2026-11-07.
01 / Tale of the tape
Spec by spec. Winner in orange.
Orange bar = the better figure on that row. Hatched = not listed.
02 / Full spec sheet
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kingbull Rover 2.0 | Haoqi Cheetah 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (as listed) | $1,299better | $1,599 |
| Battery | 720 Wh | 1,200 Whbetter |
| Claimed range | 60 mi | 85 mibetter |
| Weight | 80 lb | 77 lbbetter |
| Max rider weight | 400 lb | 400 lb |
| Top speed | 28 mph | 28 mph |
| Motor | 750 W | 1,200 W peak |
| Frame | Mountain | Mountain |
| Tires | 26 x 4.0 in | 26 x 4 in |
| Brakes | Hydraulic disc | Hydraulic disc |
| Overall score | 2.9 / 10 | 5.9 / 10 |
"Better" marks the lower price and weight or the higher figure on the other rows. Motor watts are shown but not compared because brands quote rated and peak watts differently. How we score.
- Kingbull Rover 2.0: Full suspension. Throttle-only speed is limited to 20 mph. Brand page also lists 1,300 W peak.
- Haoqi Cheetah 2.0: Full suspension. Weight is 77 lb or 83 lb depending on battery option. Sale price on Nov 7; regular price $2,399.